Skip to content

ROBERT.DICKINSON

My feedback

73 results found

  1. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON shared this idea  · 
  3. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  4. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  6. 18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  7. 25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  8. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ROBERT.DICKINSON commented  · 

    You can use shapefiles to communicate between ICM and CIvil 3d but there needs to be many mapping files. The shapefiles are good for the network and all of the output parameters,

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  9. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  10. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  11. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  12. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  13. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  14. 37 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    IN DISCUSSION  ·  pascal.lang responded

    We have spent quite a bit of time investigating how validation improvements might be achieved, whether that be through validation as a background task or whether it be with improvements on the speed of validation in the first place.

    There is no silver bullet which has been identified so far, the validation is already very efficient with minimal potential for speed improvements and there are issues with it as a background task as previously mentioned which we haven’t got fully fledged solutions to yet.

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  15. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  16. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  17. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  18. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ROBERT.DICKINSON supported this idea  · 
  19. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ROBERT.DICKINSON commented  · 

    You can import shapefiles from ArcGIS Pro using the Open data center of ICM.

  20. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ROBERT.DICKINSON commented  · 

    comment by RED - SWMM5 uses a CSTR pollutant solution for nodes and links - this is not easily transferable to the ICM 1D solution.

    ROBERT.DICKINSON shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4

Feedback and Knowledge Base