Lucy Moxon
My feedback
9 results found
-
2 votes
Thank you for the suggestion and thanks to those who commented and voted. This is to confirm that we've received and reviewed your suggestion and here is our response:
We believe that stormwater controls are the most critical element of the drainage design. Hence we show the results of SWCs as soon as the simulation is finalised.
Users can/should check the rest of the model to ensure that there aren't any bottlenecks in the system.
It might be feasible to implement a dropdown menu within the SWC results so we can still show results from SWCs, but we make it easier for users to jump to different screens and check the inflows, connections and junctions.
Would the above address what is required for this case?
Lucy Moxon
shared this idea
·
-
8 votesLucy Moxon
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Thank you for the suggestion and thanks to those who commented and voted.
If you try to build your swales using the SWCs rather than converting links to swales, you will see that you can start from the top area and go down (1:3) or you can start from the bottom and go up (1:3).
Does the above address your suggestion? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts once you try it.
Lucy Moxon
shared this idea
·
-
8 votes
Thank you for submitting, commenting and voting on this User-Voice idea. We have reviewed the requirements, and this is now on our roadmap for development for future releases of InfoDrainage.
An error occurred while saving the comment -
3 votes
Thank you for the suggestion and thanks to those who commented and voted.
Within SWCs, we have added an option called Under Drain, with this option, you can model a perforated pipe, and once the pipe is out of the system into the flow control chamber, it won't be perforated anymore so you can use a conventional pipe to model it.
Please feel free to touch base with our support team if you have any questions on the above.
Does the above address your suggestion?
Lucy Moxon
shared this idea
·
-
5 votesLucy Moxon
shared this idea
·
-
2 votes
The report that is automatically generated by InfoDrainage has this detail when you tick Inflows (see screenshot attached). InfoDrainage will report on every subcatchment and detail what CV values have been used for summer and winter.
Does the above address your suggestion?
Lucy Moxon
shared this idea
·
-
1 vote
Thank you for the suggestion and thanks to those who commented and voted.
In InfoDrainage, junctions are used as nodes without volume to enable modelling a Y or T junction, or it could be a point in the middle of a culvert that is getting wider for some reason.
You are right; when the pipe US and DS cover levels are 0, and the junction has a level of 0, the model will find no way to design the system and run the design wizard. Therefore, to address this, we've implemented a warning message that will stop users from proceeding with the design if they have junctions and the associated ends of the pipe have a 0 level (that hasn't been overwritten). Users can still use the level 0 but they need to overwrite the default 0 to proceed. The warning message will be made available to users in a…
Lucy Moxon
shared this idea
·
-
3 votes
Thank you for the suggestion, and thanks to those who commented and voted. This is to confirm that we've received your suggestion and that it will be reviewed for future consideration.
We are working on enhancing the long section, so it shows more data in the tables, and we made it flexible so users can select what to view. We are also working on annotating the Hydraulic Grade Line and the Energy Grade Line. This is now on our road map for future releases of InfoDrainage.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lucy Moxon
commented
It would be great if the longsections that can be viewed on screen via the Flow Path tool showed pipe number, pipe size, pipe gradient as the principal data points, and could be output into CAD sections with a choice of what data is shown - ie, manhole level and pipe level, or manhole level only, or pipe details only, etc
But it must please label clearly which one it is doing. If it just says "depth" we will all be wasting a lot of time manually checking the levels with a calculator - or worse, forgetting to check and making mistakes.