Adrian Labonde
My feedback
59 results found
-
5 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
4 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
4 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
6 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
10 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
7 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
14 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
21 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
11 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
6 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
17 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
6 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
2 votesAdrian Labonde shared this idea ·
-
4 votes
Thank you for the suggestion and thanks to those who commented and voted. This is to confirm that we've received your suggestion and that it will be reviewed and discussed for future consideration.
Adrian Labonde supported this idea · -
9 votesAdrian Labonde shared this idea ·
-
5 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
5 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
84 votesAdrian Labonde supported this idea ·
-
26 votes
We are looking into this, but for the majority of cases it might be that there is already a significant improvement related to this with the new “Clip meshing” which was released with version 11.0 of the software, but in a prototype state, please ensure outputs are reviewed before use. The reason it provides an improvement is that it does a coarse mesh first (which is likely to remain unchanged if only small amendments are made) and follows this with a more detailed mesh after. It would be great to get any feedback you might have on your experiences with the Clip meshing and consistency of results.
Adrian Labonde supported this idea ·