Salam Jamadar
My feedback
35 results found
-
8 votesSalam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesSalam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesSalam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesSalam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesSalam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesSalam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Thank you for the addition of this request, we are in discussions about how this might be achieved as the level of awareness of tasks is varied between agents. Would a dashboard showing who sent which simulation where (which are still ongoing) be sufficient? This would be without the progress those simulations have already made available as a first step.
Salam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Thanks for this request, for application to 1D networks the profile for subcatchments could be used but if the rainfall needs to be applied to a 2D zone as well where spatial distribution is required then in that instance this wouldn’t work I guess so I see the need here.
Salam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
-
84 votesSalam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesSalam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Salam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
We are looking into this, but for the majority of cases it might be that there is already a significant improvement related to this with the new “Clip meshing” which was released with version 11.0 of the software, but in a prototype state, please ensure outputs are reviewed before use. The reason it provides an improvement is that it does a coarse mesh first (which is likely to remain unchanged if only small amendments are made) and follows this with a more detailed mesh after. It would be great to get any feedback you might have on your experiences with the Clip meshing and consistency of results.
Salam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
We are currently discussing our licensing technology to see what and where we need to improve. If you have ideas or additional needs – please let us know here.
Salam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
Salam Jamadar
shared this idea
·
-
9 votesSalam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
The approach which we are looking to leverage here is one which deviates a little from the original request but gives the same ability to interrogate results part way through a simulation. After investigating options, the best appears to be to have a run for the total duration you are interested in, then set a state saving checkbox in the run and when you wish to interrogate simulation results stop the simulation. We will then make use of ICMLive developed concatenation of results to allow us to tie in the “continuation run” with the results which were stopped earlier. There is a lot more detail to this than I can add here, but it should meet the need.
Salam Jamadar
supported this idea
·
It will also be good to automatically hide non relevant fields such as if Wallingford/ New UK runoff model is used all other parameter for other models are switched off etc