Tom Walker
My feedback
26 results found
-
5 votesTom Walker
shared this idea
·
-
4 votes
Thanks for the idea!
The slot width field is used to define the width of the drain when using a 2D conduit. Are you after a field to define preissmann slot?
Tom Walker
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
6 votes
Thanks for the idea. Have you tried using the different sort options in the tree?
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom Walker
commented
Thanks for the reply Sophia, I cant really do that in this case. As for example when we investigate problem in the sewer network we have multiple rounds of surveys when issues arise in previous surveys. (Such as an unchartered sewer that we've then put another flow survey in). In this case we would want to organise the surveys to be into objects next to each other in the model group to indicate their hierarchy.
Tom Walker
shared this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom Walker
commented
Totally agree with this. As when developing options to rehabilitate the sewer network its an iterative process that often leads to multiple scenarios being tested before the final is established. This leads to a very disorganised list of scenarios as you typically don't know what might work till you've tested it. To aid model use and record keeping it would be really useful to re-order a final scenario to the top for example to identify that it has been used in design.
Tom Walker
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesTom Walker
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesTom Walker
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesTom Walker
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesTom Walker
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom Walker
commented
Please can this feature be looked at. As I often have to manually re-arrange toolbars to work with the software. I work with colleagues that have got so fed up they just leave the toolbars all stacked up to the left and work within the letterbox that's left for the network window.
Tom Walker
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Interesting idea. Could I ask you to clarify the visual comparison task; e.g What are you comparing?
Tom Walker
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom Walker
commented
I would support this idea. I could visualise something that if you opened two networks together the two windows view would be locked temporarily. So that the view on both networks are mirrored and the object labels are mirrored. As often we have so much clicking between objects/windows to work out what's changed or interrogate results. Thanks
-
6 votesTom Walker
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesTom Walker
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesTom Walker
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesTom Walker
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom Walker
commented
Fully support this idea. As the InfoWorks application uses the SMB protocol to read/write to a file share. Transferring a 2GB file we can see network speeds of 40Mpbs during the transfer with Infoworks. Simulating the same 2GB file transfer with Windows Explorer we see file transfer speeds up to 800Mpbs, i.e. 20 times faster. A detailed WireShark trace shows InfoWorks negotiates a 4K block length for the file transfer, whereas Windows Explorer negotiates a 1MB block length, which is significantly more efficient for large file transfers.
Can Innovyze tune the InfoWorks application to make better use of the latest SMB Protocols (3.1.1) tuning for large file transfers? -
11 votesTom Walker
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesTom Walker
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom Walker
commented
Fully support this change. When viewing and using graphs, Flow monitor references are so much more useful than a generic page number when trying to find a location.
-
19 votesTom Walker
shared this idea
·
-
19 votesTom Walker
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom Walker
commented
Agree fully, I too have shared the pain of importing multiple events with over 100 flow monitors and having to click on each monitor/rain gauge individually. Then it is necessary to check through a dialog box that only displays three/four monitors at a time to make sure none have been missed is very tedious. An 'Import all' feature would be so helpful.
Also on the Custom Graph when viewing the data, is it possible to have flow monitor references not page numbers when scrolling through the data? As for large surveys with changes in monitor numbers it is very tedious to keep having to browse through the pages to find a monitor. -
23 votesTom Walker
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom Walker
commented
Agree with this 100%. Regulators are increasingly looking at sewer network performance using actual long term rainfall data rather than shorter design events. This can take multiple hours to generate and often users are not sure if ICM has crashed or if results are still processing due to the absence of a progress bar. If this could be ran in the background like a simulation or meshing task, it would be much more user friendly.
-
29 votesTom Walker
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom Walker
commented
Hi There, Would it be possible to include the 'Tab' Button to move across to another cell as per windows. As often if you are editing an attribute, you need to change the flag also, this requires manually clicking on the next box and selecting. If you could just tab across and then input using the keyboard, it would be much easier to do multiple object updates. Such as updating models from surveys/as built drawings etc.
Agree with this, the placing of storage compensation calculations in the notes field needs moving as its clashing with important modelling commentary.