Michael Kenyon
My feedback
6 results found
-
6 votes
Thanks for this idea, I agree that it would be great to see this.
Michael Kenyon
shared this idea
·
-
26 votes
We are looking into this, but for the majority of cases it might be that there is already a significant improvement related to this with the new “Clip meshing” which was released with version 11.0 of the software, but in a prototype state, please ensure outputs are reviewed before use. The reason it provides an improvement is that it does a coarse mesh first (which is likely to remain unchanged if only small amendments are made) and follows this with a more detailed mesh after. It would be great to get any feedback you might have on your experiences with the Clip meshing and consistency of results.
Michael Kenyon
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
The approach which we are looking to leverage here is one which deviates a little from the original request but gives the same ability to interrogate results part way through a simulation. After investigating options, the best appears to be to have a run for the total duration you are interested in, then set a state saving checkbox in the run and when you wish to interrogate simulation results stop the simulation. We will then make use of ICMLive developed concatenation of results to allow us to tie in the “continuation run” with the results which were stopped earlier. There is a lot more detail to this than I can add here, but it should meet the need.
Michael Kenyon
supported this idea
·
-
84 votesMichael Kenyon
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesMichael Kenyon
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesMichael Kenyon
supported this idea
·
