Dave White
My feedback
21 results found
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Dave White
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesDave White
shared this idea
·
-
29 votesDave White
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesDave White
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
As each INP is a set of physical conditions and event data, the Open Data Import Center imports only the physical network objects.
Dave White
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesDave White
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesDave White
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesDave White
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesDave White
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Dear User,
Thanks for posting, commenting and voting for this idea. We have reviewed the requirements for implementing a clash detection tool in InfoDrainage, and this is currently in Development for future releases of the software.
As for the comments regarding the pipe thickness, we will enable customers to insert a tolerance value so users can account for both the pipe trench width/height and the pipe thickness when deciding the vertical and horizontal tolerance values.
Kind Regards,
InfoDrainage Product Management team
Dave White
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
The approach which we are looking to leverage here is one which deviates a little from the original request but gives the same ability to interrogate results part way through a simulation. After investigating options, the best appears to be to have a run for the total duration you are interested in, then set a state saving checkbox in the run and when you wish to interrogate simulation results stop the simulation. We will then make use of ICMLive developed concatenation of results to allow us to tie in the “continuation run” with the results which were stopped earlier. There is a lot more detail to this than I can add here, but it should meet the need.
Dave White
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
We have spent quite a bit of time investigating how validation improvements might be achieved, whether that be through validation as a background task or whether it be with improvements on the speed of validation in the first place.
There is no silver bullet which has been identified so far, the validation is already very efficient with minimal potential for speed improvements and there are issues with it as a background task as previously mentioned which we haven’t got fully fledged solutions to yet.
Dave White
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesDave White
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesDave White
shared this idea
·
-
6 votesDave White
shared this idea
·
-
14 votesDave White
shared this idea
·
-
7 votesDave White
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteDave White
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesDave White
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesDave White
supported this idea
·
Currently we must take the cross section data and adjust the geodetic elevations into depths (lowest elevation to 0m depth).
Would be nice to be able to use this cross section line to import it into the channel object and have it automatically do this process for us.