Skip to content

A. Weisgerber

← User Feedback Forum for Innovyze Products and Services

My feedback

19 results found

  1. Python scripting API for ICM

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  2. Model results as TVD connectors

    19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Live Modeling  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  3. Allow to import generic (geo)TIFF into Spatial TSDB

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Rainfall  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  4. Integrate a Template option for setting out run group in Infoworks ICM

    25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    IN DISCUSSION  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  5. Support for more than two simulations in long sections

    25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » River Modeling  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  6. Simple means to set initial storage area water surface elevations

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Hydraulics  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  7. Removing missing GIS-layers

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Other  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  8. Set up runs more efficiently

    28 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    IN DISCUSSION  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  9. Bank marker distinctions

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » River Modeling  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  10. Alert on river sections without having to make 1D results points

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Live Modeling  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  11. Post processing scripts as part of a live simulation

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Live Modeling  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  12. Total sediment ( SF1+SF2).

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  1 comment  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Other  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    A. Weisgerber commented  · 

    This could be achieved by implementing the feature request "User defined results fields"
    The user could define a new field TS=SF1+SF2

  13. Use TSDB data streams in flexible graphs

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Visualization  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  14. Local water quality settings.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  1 comment  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Other  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    A. Weisgerber commented  · 

    This functionnality would be useful for a WQ model containing different processes in different part of the network, for example river + estuary, where the upstream and downstream reaches behave quite differently.
    One suggestion would be to create WQ zones, with each zone WQ settings overridding the default generic model-wide WQ settings.

    Note: this is an issue for sediments as well, where sediment parameter for the upstream reaches might not be the same as those for lower/flatter/estuary reaches.

  15. User defined results fields

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Reporting  ·  Admin →
    RECEIVED  ·  pascal.lang responded

    Thanks for this idea, while it can already be done for themes, extending this out for results generation sounds good. The assumption is that a retrospectively applied SQL to populate User Text 1 with the desired result isn’t sufficient for this requirement?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    A. Weisgerber commented  · 

    Ideally the user-defined variables can be displayed in graphs and results tables, as well as being exportable, and usable for alerts in ICMLive. Pretty much like a build-in variable.

    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  16. Pollution from the rainfall.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    MORE INFO NEEDED  ·  2 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Other  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    A. Weisgerber commented  · 

    This could be achieved with the proposal "Allow pollutographs to apply on subcatchments " for 1D or 1D-2D models.
    For direct 2D rainfall however, it would require a new 2D surface washoff model.

  17. Alert Action Repetition Control - repeat action after alert has been active for Xnr runs

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Live Modeling  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  18. Allow pollutographs to apply on subcatchments

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Hydrology  ·  Admin →
    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

  19. Inverse Distance Weightage in ICM

    25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  1 comment  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Rainfall  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    A. Weisgerber commented  · 

    The great advantage of IDW over Thiessens polygons is that it allows on-the-fly reconfiguration of the zone of influence for each rainfall station when some are down, without needing manual specification of input B/C. It is also more accurate when many rainfall stations are down, in which case the inputs B/C are not valid any more.

    A. Weisgerber supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)