Martin Spiers
My feedback
37 results found
-
6 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
You can scale the labels in InfoDrainage from the display setting to ensure that they do not clash.
Does the above address your suggestion re moving labels?
Martin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
The report that is automatically generated by InfoDrainage has this detail when you tick Inflows (see screenshot attached). InfoDrainage will report on every subcatchment and detail what CV values have been used for summer and winter.
Does the above address your suggestion?
Martin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Thank you for the suggestion and thanks to those who commented and voted.
Within SWCs, we have added an option called Under Drain, with this option, you can model a perforated pipe, and once the pipe is out of the system into the flow control chamber, it won't be perforated anymore so you can use a conventional pipe to model it.
Please feel free to touch base with our support team if you have any questions on the above.
Does the above address your suggestion?
Martin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Thank you for the suggestion and thanks to those who commented and voted.
If you try to build your swales using the SWCs rather than converting links to swales, you will see that you can start from the top area and go down (1:3) or you can start from the bottom and go up (1:3).
Does the above address your suggestion? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts once you try it.
Martin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Thank you for the suggestion and thanks to those who commented and voted.
The inlet pipe will always try to sync to the bed level of your Storm Water Control (SWC), however, you can easily lock the pipe and manipulate the level so your inlet pipe can be higher and your outlet pipe can be lower. You can introduce inlet and outlet chambers and you will have full flexibility in dropping the levels as required.
Does the above address the issue?
Martin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Thank you for the suggestion. This is to confirm that we've received your idea and it will be reviewed by the product management and development team for future consideration.
Martin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Thank you for submitting, commenting and voting on this User-Voice idea. We have reviewed the requirements, and this is now on our roadmap for development for future releases of InfoDrainage.
Martin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Martin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
Thank you for this idea addition, it is something we have been considering and building out plans for, if there are more specifics in terms of the exact outputs/comparisons you would like to see, please feel free to add so we can ensure these are captured.
Martin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Great ideas! The goal is the simplify the physical location to either measured (as-built) or designed locations of pond outfalls, while either logically enforcing the relationship of outfalls to pond/outlet without forced links that do not represent physical pipes.
Martin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
Microdrainage has this functionality