Martin Spiers
My feedback
37 results found
-
6 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
3 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Thank you for the suggestion and thanks to those who commented and voted. This is to confirm that we've received your suggestion and that it will be reviewed and discussed for future consideration.
Martin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesMartin Spiers
shared this idea
·
-
26 votes
We are looking into this, but for the majority of cases it might be that there is already a significant improvement related to this with the new “Clip meshing” which was released with version 11.0 of the software, but in a prototype state, please ensure outputs are reviewed before use. The reason it provides an improvement is that it does a coarse mesh first (which is likely to remain unchanged if only small amendments are made) and follows this with a more detailed mesh after. It would be great to get any feedback you might have on your experiences with the Clip meshing and consistency of results.
Martin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesMartin Spiers
shared this idea
·
-
7 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesMartin Spiers
supported this idea
·
It doesn't seem possible to extract the flood extents within a 1D river reach from ICM: neither an export of the 2D mesh results (understandably) or of flood contours (less understandably) includes all the sections of the 1D channel which are wet.
HECRAS and FloodModeller are capable of combining 1D and 2D results to create an output showing the extent of flooding