Adrian Labonde
My feedback
59 results found
-
9 votes
Interesting idea. Could I ask you to clarify the visual comparison task; e.g What are you comparing?
-
23 votesAdrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesAdrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesAdrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Currently under discussion how to support AutoCAD Civil 3D drawings files, including prioritization of objects and defining workflows.
-
10 votes
-
7 votes
-
11 votes
-
8 votes
Interesting idea.
We need more information on the problem of pipe clashes. Are these unconnected pipes in the model or are they referencing Asset networks, or Water networks?
How granular of a view does one need? I.e. are you interesting in generally where these crossing occur, or are you trying to identify how close you can cross something else?
-
7 votes
Gathering some example models for the development team to consider.
An error occurred while saving the comment Adrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesAdrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesAdrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
Thank you for this idea addition, it is something we have been considering and building out plans for, if there are more specifics in terms of the exact outputs/comparisons you would like to see, please feel free to add so we can ensure these are captured.
Adrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesAdrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Adrian Labonde
commented
I support this idea. In fact, I have a similar/related feature suggestion.
Indeed it would be great to see more digits in the grid. Issue: when copy+pastying grid-values, often information is lost.
We encountered this when dealing with X/Y-coordinates. Tables are copied with display precision, an in the case of x/y coordinates that's up to 1 decimal case. Unfortunately there isn't a better way than using the Open Data Export Centre.
Having additional digits/decimal cases in the grid would save us time.Adrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteAdrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesAdrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
The functionality is already provided with the Digitisation Template in WS Pro. Please confirm what enhancement are you suggesting. Thanks
Adrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesAdrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesAdrian Labonde
supported this idea
·
We experienced this issue with larger models (6 mio cells +) as well.
Suggesting to significantly improve the rendering performance of the 2D elements in the GeoPlan.
There are a number of options that can be taken in the properties and themes dialogues, like reducing the graphic quality, but it does not improve much.
Applying different zoom levels could help in this context...
In our case, a powerful machine is used (Quadro RTX 24 GB, SSD, 128 GB Ram).
According to support, "this process uses only one thread, perhaps disabling hyprethreading can improve performance."
We suggest looking at "progressive rendering" / "active window boundary limitation".
The requirements for the modellers dealing with larger mode,ls stress the need to allow efficient Geoplan panning for larger and complex models. In particular the panning performance around and beyond the current technical 2D elements limit around 30 mio cells.
Improving this would make the modelling much more efficient.